Ooni Fyra 12 vs Kamado Joe Classic III
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right one
Ooni
Ooni Fyra 12
£299
Kamado Joe
Kamado Joe Classic III
£224
Quick Summary
The Kamado Joe Classic III edges ahead overall, but the Ooni Fyra 12 may still be the right choice depending on your priorities. Consider what matters most to you - value, features, or brand reputation.
Key Differences
- •The Kamado Joe Classic III is £75 cheaper, making it the more budget-friendly option.
- •Different fuel types: Ooni Fyra 12 is wood-fired-powered, Kamado Joe Classic III is kamado-powered. This impacts heat-up time, flavour, and ease of use.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Overview
Ratings
Best For
Pros & Cons
Ooni Fyra 12
👍 Pros
- ✓ Authentic wood flavour
- ✓ Gravity-fed hopper
- ✓ Good price
⚠️ Cons
- • More maintenance
- • Pellet management needed
Kamado Joe Classic III
👍 Pros
- ✓ SloRoller technology
- ✓ Divide & Conquer system
- ✓ Lifetime warranty
⚠️ Cons
- • Heavy
- • Expensive
- • Learning curve
Winner by Category
Best for Beginners
Both are equally suitable for beginners.
Best Performance
Performance is comparable between both options.
Best Value
Kamado Joe Classic III provides superior value at its price point.
Best Premium Option
Ooni Fyra 12 represents the higher-end choice with premium features.
Our Recommendation
It's a close call
Both the Ooni Fyra 12 and Kamado Joe Classic III are strong choices - the right one depends on your specific needs.
Choose the Ooni Fyra 12 if: You prioritise best premium option.
Choose the Kamado Joe Classic III if: You want to save money.
Both will serve you well - trust your gut on which aligns better with your cooking style and budget.
Ooni Fyra 12
£299
Kamado Joe Classic III
£224
Compare Other Products
Not the comparison you were looking for? Select different products to compare.
Choose Different Products